Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

90 S.W.2d 840
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 389 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 12, 1936·No. No. 17966·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor, punishment assessed being one year in the penitentiary.

Sinqe the conviction, the law upon which the prosecution was predicated has been repealed without any saving clause. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 90 S.W.2d 840 (Tex. 1936).

90 S.W.2d 840 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)