Smith v. State

72 S.W.2d 281, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 431
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 6, 1934·No. No. 16975·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for murder; punishment assessed at twenty years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

We note that in pronouncing sentence against appellant the record before us shows that the court inadvertently, omitted to give appellant the benefit of the Indeterminate Sentence Law (Vernon’s Ann. C. C P. art. 775).- The sentence will be reformed to direct that he be confined in the penitentiary for not less than two nor more than twenty yeará

As thus reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 72 S.W.2d 281, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 923 (Tex. 1934).

72 S.W.2d 281 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.