Smith v. State

113 S.W.2d 902, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Tex. Crim. 273
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 1938·No. No. 19482·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the liquor law by unlawfully having liquor in her possession when she only had a license for the sale of beer’ and wine, and her punishment was assessed at a fine of $100. ••

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Hence the only matter presented for review is the sufficiency of the complaint and information to charge the offense of which appellant was convicted.

An examination of the information discloses that is in due form and sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 113 S.W.2d 902, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 925 (Tex. 1938).

113 S.W.2d 902 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.