Smith v. State

280 S.W. 581
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 633
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 17, 1926·No. No. 9884·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Appeal is from a conviction for unlawfully carrying a pistol, the punishment being a fine of $100.

Prosecution was by complaint and information. The complaint recites that affiant has “good reason to believe” that appellant committed the offense charged, but omitted the further allegation required by the statute, “and does believe.” Subdivision 2, art. 222, C. C. P. 1925 Revision. This defect was pointed out by motion in arrest of judgment which was overruled. It should have beert sustained. Smith v. State, 76 S. W. 436, 45; Tex. Cr. R. 411; Tompkins v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 77 S. W. 800; Green v. State, 136 S. W. 467, 62 Tex. Cr. R. 50; Ex parte Ross, 261 S. W. 1042, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 451.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 280 S.W. 581 (Tex. 1926).

280 S.W. 581 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte J.J. Ross
261 S.W. 1042 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Ford v. State
77 S.W. 800 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1903)
Smith v. State
76 S.W. 436 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1903)
Green v. State
136 S.W. 467 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)