Smith v. State

260 S.W. 847, 97 Tex. Crim. 191, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 254
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Tex. Crim. 273
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 2, 1924·No. No. 8162.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Ochiltree County of the offense of playing at a game of cards in a public place, and his punishment fixed at a fine of fifty dollars.

This would appear to be a companion case of Bryan v. State, No. 8131, opinion handed down March 26, 1924. The prosecution ivas under Article 548 of our Penal Code, punishment for a violation of which is fixed by statute at a fine of not less than ten nor more than twenty-five dollars. The trial court instructed the jury that they might assess a punishment of not less than den nor more than fifty dollars, and the verdict fixed the penalty at the latter amount. This has been universally held to be a fundamental error. See authorities cited in the ease of Bryan v. State, supra. There are other errors complained of which will probably not occur upon another trial of the case and a discussion of which is pretermitted.

For the error mentioned the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 260 S.W. 847, 97 Tex. Crim. 191, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 254 (Tex. 1924).

260 S.W. 847 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.