Smith v. State

280 S.W. 813, 103 Tex. Crim. 264, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 633
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 20, 1926·No. No. 9473.·Published

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The consideration of the purported statement of facts is not authorized for the reason that it is void of verification by the trial judge. A certificate of approval by the trial judge is essential. Art. 760, C. C. P. 1925.

•In the absence of a statement of facts, we are not able to appraise the bill of exceptions complaining of the denial of the motion for a continuance.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 280 S.W. 813, 103 Tex. Crim. 264, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 174 (Tex. 1926).

280 S.W. 813 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.