Smith v. State

218 S.W. 1048, 87 Tex. Crim. 12, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 93
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 81 Tex. Crim. 368
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 25, 1920·No. No. 5689.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of personal property and awarded five years in the penitentiary.

There were objections to the charge, but they cannot be intelligently revised or understood without the statement of facts, which is not incorporated in nor does it accompany the record. As the record presents the matter these matters cannot be considered. The charges may have been proper and in accord with the facts. We are unable at least to revise these exceptions without the evidence.

The judgment, therefore, will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 218 S.W. 1048, 87 Tex. Crim. 12, 1920 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 93 (Tex. 1920).

218 S.W. 1048 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.