Smith v. State
This text of 211 S.W. 944 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case appellant was convicted in the County Court at law of Harris County, Texas, of a violation of the tick eradication Act passed by the Thirty-fifth Legislature and on appeal brings his case before us for review. The facts need not be stated as the case must be reversed and dismissed because the information and complaint are fatally defective.
Section 15 of chapter 60 of the General Laws of Texas enacted by the Thirty-fifth Legislature, penalizes any person, company or corporation owing, controlling or caring for any domestic animal or animals located in any territory quarantined through the provi *282 sions of said Act, who shall refuse or fail to dip such live stock at such time and manner “as directed in writing by the Live Stock Sanitary Commission.”
This clearly requires the State to allege and prove a notification in writing of the time and manner such dipping is required to be done by the Live Stock Sanitary Commission. An inspection of the complaint and information in the instant case discloses a failure to allege that the notification was in writing. This is fatally defective.
The case will be reversed and dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 S.W. 944, 85 Tex. Crim. 281, 1919 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-texcrimapp-1919.