Smith v. State

102 S.W. 1198, 51 Tex. Crim. 441, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 168
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 1907·No. No. 3557.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for passing a forged instrument. He filed motion to withdraw his notice of appeal in the trial court, which fact was entered upon the minutes of the court, and transmitted with the record to this court for its action. Appellant had the right to withdraw his appeal and accept sentence in the trial court; having filed his motion to withdraw his notice of appeal there, it should have been granted, but this court will grant appellant’s request, and dismiss the appeal, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 102 S.W. 1198, 51 Tex. Crim. 441, 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 168 (Tex. 1907).

102 S.W. 1198 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miles v. State
299 S.W. 246 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Watson v. State
107 S.W. 544 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)