Miles v. State
This text of 299 S.W. 246 (Miles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor punishment one year in the penitentiary.
The record is before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. There appears in the record an effort on the part of appellant, at a time when the trial court was in vacation and after notice of appeal had been given and the jurisdiction of this court- had attached, to withdraw his notice of appeal. We are referred to the memorandum decision of this court in the case of Smith v. State, 102 S. W. 1198, as authority supporting the action of the court below in permitting appellant to withdraw his appeal. It does not appear from the short *121 statement of the opinion rendered in said Smith case whether the effort to withdraw notice of appeal was during the term or after the expiration of the term. Being of opinion that it could not be done legally after the expiration of the term, we must conclude that under the facts before the court in said Smith case the effort to withdraw was made during the term. The indictment herein correctly charges the offense, and is followed by the charge given to the jury. No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 S.W. 246, 108 Tex. Crim. 120, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-state-texcrimapp-1927.