Smith v. State
This text of Smith v. State (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Quentin L. Smith, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from Greenwood County
James W. Johnson, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr., Post Conviction Relief Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2007-MO-003
Submitted December 7, 2006 Filed January 16, 2007
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
C. Rauch Wise, of Greenwood, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the denial of post conviction relief (PCR) to Petitioner. We dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-sc-2007.