Smith v. State

1969 OK CR 324, 466 P.2d 654, 1969 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 588
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 462 P.2d 328
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided December 3, 1969·No. No. A-14599·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction for the crime of “Escape.” Plaintiff in error, escaped from custody while he was at the University Hospital in Oklahoma City. He [655]*655was an inmate of the state penitentiary and was granted special permission to attend the hospital for his own benefit, when he escaped from the custody of the guard. Defendant was tried on the charge, without a jury, and the court assessed his punishment at two years confinement.

After examining the briefs and record filed in this case, we are of the opinion defendant’s contention that he was denied a speedy trial is without merit, and the appeal herein should therefore be affirmed.

It is therefore the order of the Court that the judgment and sentence in Pittsburg County District Court case number 6102 shall be affirmed.

BUSSEY, J., concurs. NIX, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 1969 OK CR 324, 466 P.2d 654, 1969 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 588 (Okla. Ct. App. 1969).

1969 OK CR 324 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.