Smith v. State

1968 OK CR 57, 438 P.2d 944, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 20, 1968
DocketNo. A-14578
StatusPublished

This text of 1968 OK CR 57 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 1968 OK CR 57, 438 P.2d 944, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Justice.

This is an original proceeding in which the petitioner, an inmate of the Federal Penitentiary in Leavenworth, Kansas, seeks an order of this Court directing the dismissal of charges pending against him in the Justice of the Peace Court of Oklahoma County, Warrant No. F-956.

Petitioner does not allege that he has ever been in custody of the Oklahoma County authorities and confined under Warrant No. F-956, but rather that he was imprisoned in the State Penitentiary during the pen-dency of this charge by virtue of a judgment and sentence rendered against him in Beckham County, Oklahoma. The records of this Court (See Smith v. Page, Okl.Cr., 434 P.2d 491) reflect that while a prisoner serving the sentence from Beckham County, the petitioner escaped, was apprehended by the Federal authorities, prosecuted for the offense for which he is currently incarcerated, but released to the State of Oklahoma to serve out the balance of his sentence from Beckham County, which, according to his petition, was completed in October, 1967, whereupon he was taken into custody by the Federal authorities to serve out the present Federal sentence which, according to his Exhibit “A”, expires February 19, 1970.

Petitioner has never sought in this Court an application for Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum requesting a speedy trial, duly filed in the method provided by law, and is not, therefore, entitled to the relief prayed for. See Jennings v. State, Okl.Cr., 362 P.2d 470, 471. See also Auten v. State, Okl.Cr., 377 P.2d 61.

Petitioner’s application is accordingly denied. Writ denied.

BRETT, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Auten v. State
1962 OK CR 153 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1962)
Jennings v. State
1961 OK CR 57 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1961)
Smith v. Page
1967 OK CR 198 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1968 OK CR 57, 438 P.2d 944, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.