Smith v. State
1911 OK CR 5333, 119 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 698, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 539
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Okla. Crim. 282 →
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was convicted of selling whisky. No error of law appears and while the proof on the part of the prosecution consists of the testimony of a single witness, of doubtful credibility, it was the province of the jury to pass upon the weight and credibility of the evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 1911 OK CR 5333, 119 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 698, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 539 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).
1911 OK CR 5333 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.