Smith v. State
1911 OK CR 171, 114 P. 1133, 5 Okla. Crim. 675, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Okla. Crim. 282 →
Opinion
A careful investigation of the record in this case shows that the appellant was properly tried and convicted in the court below. The only question worthy of consideration here was settled 'by the Supreme Court of this state in the case of Ex parte Thomas, in an opinion by Mr. Justice Dunn, found in 1 Okla. Cr. 210, 97 Pac. 260. The doctrine established in the Thomas case was specifically approved by this court in the case of State v. Homer Jones, 3 Okla. Cr. 412, 106 Pac. 351. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 1911 OK CR 171, 114 P. 1133, 5 Okla. Crim. 675, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).
1911 OK CR 171 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Thomas
97 P. 260 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1908)
State v. Jones
1910 OK CR 22 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1910)