Smith v. State
Opinion
[¶1] Michael Keondre Smith appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Smith argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel's failure to reasonably investigate prior to trial and failure to call a police officer as a witness. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
See
Steinbach v. State
,
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2019 ND 33 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.