Smith v. State

2019 ND 33, 923 N.W.2d 149
North Dakota Supreme Court·Decided February 21, 2019·No. 20180276·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Michael Keondre Smith appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Smith argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel's failure to reasonably investigate prior to trial and failure to call a police officer as a witness. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). See Steinbach v. State , 2015 ND 34 , ¶ 10, 859 N.W.2d 1 ("[t]he applicant must first overcome the strong presumption counsel's representation fell within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.").

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 2019 ND 33, 923 N.W.2d 149 (N.D. 2019).

2019 ND 33 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
2019 ND 33 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)