Smith v. State

4 S.E.2d 687, 60 Ga. App. 623, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 109
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 19, 1939·No. 27552·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

Where the only proof that one was in possession of an article prohibited by law (whisky) 'in Whitfield County, [624] Georgia, .was by the testimony of a police officer that “I am a police officer in the City of Dalton. . . I was collecting street taxes at- that time, and . . I went over there [to the defendant’s house and found liquor],” there is no proof that the possession was in Whitfield County. Therefore the judgment is reversed for the reason that the State failed to sufficiently establish the venue. Gibson v. State, 52 Ga. App. 297 (183 S. E. 83), and cit.; Whitfield v. State, 51 Ga. App. 439 (180 S. E. 630); Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754; Cooper v. State, 106 Ga. 119 (2) (32 S. E. 23). Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Guerry, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 4 S.E.2d 687, 60 Ga. App. 623, 1939 Ga. App. LEXIS 109 (Ga. Ct. App. 1939).

4 S.E.2d 687 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
180 S.E.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)