Smith v. State

113 S.E. 66, 28 Ga. App. 736, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 816
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 654
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1922·No. 13560·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The several exceptions to the charge of the court, when considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the ease, are without substantial merit.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., oonour.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 113 S.E. 66, 28 Ga. App. 736, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 816 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 66 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.