Smith v. State
112 S.E. 904, 28 Ga. App. 641, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 749
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 654 →
Opinion
The conviction of the defendant was fully authorized by the evidence.
The assignment of error upon the court’s failure to continue the case is without merit.
The newly discovered evidence falls within the rule that it is merely impeaching and would not likely produce a different result upon another trial.
The defendant has had a legal trial, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 112 S.E. 904, 28 Ga. App. 641, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 749 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
112 S.E. 904 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.