Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

113 S.E. 19, 28 Ga. App. 620, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 727
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 654 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 13, 1922·No. 13366·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of gaming. His case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon a careful examination of the evidence we are convinced that there is some evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

■Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 113 S.E. 19, 28 Ga. App. 620, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 727 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 19 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.