Smith v. State

112 S.E. 153, 28 Ga. App. 554, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 681
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 654
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 9, 1922·No. 13383·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds; the evidence amply supports the verdict; the questions of fact were passed upon by the jury; the trial judge has sanctioned their finding by refusing to grant a new trial, and this court cannot interfere. See Townsend v. State, 26 Ga. App. 82, 83 (105 S. E. 377), and cases cited. Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 112 S.E. 153, 28 Ga. App. 554, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 681 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

112 S.E. 153 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Townsend v. State
105 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)