Smith v. State

441 So. 2d 1062
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 29, 1983·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Nathan Smith, the appellant, pled guilty to burglary in the third degree and was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. His conviction must be reversed because his plea of guilty was not entered in compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238,89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). For this reason, the Attorney General has declined to file a brief. Boykin requires that an accused must be informed of the maximum and minimum possible sentence "as an absolute constitutional prerequisite to acceptance of a guilty plea." Carter v. State, 291 Ala. 83,85, 277 So.2d 896 (1973).

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 441 So. 2d 1062 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

441 So. 2d 1062 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elrod v. State
629 So. 2d 58 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Ex Parte Rivers
597 So. 2d 1308 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
Looney v. State
563 So. 2d 3 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Lewis v. State
479 So. 2d 1356 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)