Smith v. State

435 So. 2d 158
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 29, 1983
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 435 So. 2d 158 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 435 So. 2d 158 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

This is an appeal from a conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol. That conviction must be reversed because the information is void.

The information charged that the defendant "did commit the offense of Driving Under the Influence in violation of Section32-5A-191 of the Code of Alabama." The information is fatally defective because it does not specify whether the defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol (Section 32-5A-191 (a)(2), under the influence of a controlled substance (Section 3-5A-191 (a)(3), or under the combined influence of alcohol and a controlled substance (Section 32-5A-191 (a)(4). The information did not allege a criminal offense in that it failed to describe any offense condemned by Section 32-5A-191. People v. Sinsi,57 Ill. App.3d 716, 15 Ill.Dec. 378, 373 N.E.2d 724 (1978); Peoplev. Tucker, 131 Ill. App.2d 598, 268 N.E.2d 191 (1971); People v.Stringfield, 37 Ill. App.2d 344, 185 N.E.2d 381 (1962). See alsoBarbee v. State, 417 So.2d 611 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DeCARLO, P.J., and TYSON and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thomas
200 So. 3d 35 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2015)
State v. Keith
140 So. 3d 969 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2013)
Young v. City of Hokes Bluff
611 So. 2d 401 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Beadnell v. State
574 So. 2d 890 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Bishop v. State
555 So. 2d 317 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Royer v. State
542 So. 2d 1301 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)
Sisson v. State
528 So. 2d 1151 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Davis v. State
505 So. 2d 1303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Carroll v. City of Huntsville
505 So. 2d 389 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
City of Dothan v. Holloway
501 So. 2d 1175 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Knight v. City of Gardendale
500 So. 2d 1257 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Fields v. State
494 So. 2d 477 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Corum v. City of Huntsville
491 So. 2d 1091 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 So. 2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-alacrimapp-1983.