Smith v. State

228 So. 2d 840, 45 Ala. App. 227, 1969 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 210
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 47 Ala. App. 513
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided November 25, 1969·No. 2 Div. 13·Published

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799 is retroactive. Barnes v. State, 42 Ala.App. 504, 169 So.2d 313.

However, Smith’s lack of counsel in 1942 when he, without counsel, pleaded guilty to two indictments for assault with intent to rob does not relieve him from obeying and enduring two sentences for life. Concededly, he had counsel when arraigned and convicted on the latter. So far as this record shows, Smith is still held thereon.

Hence, though the other two sentences be void for lack of counsel, the life terms are still viable. Under Supreme Court Rule 45, the denial of coram nobis is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 228 So. 2d 840, 45 Ala. App. 227, 1969 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 210 (Ala. Ct. App. 1969).

228 So. 2d 840 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Barnes v. State
169 So. 2d 313 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1964)
Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)