Barnes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Barnes v. State

169 So. 2d 313, 42 Ala. App. 504, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 233

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 6, 1964

Docket1 Div. 995

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 169 So. 2d 313 (Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnes v. State, 169 So. 2d 313, 42 Ala. App. 504, 1964 Ala. App. LEXIS 233 (Ala. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying relief under a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. *505 The sole question is: Does Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, have retroactive effect?

The circuit judge ruled, “No.”

Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, 62 S.Ct. 1252, 86 L.Ed. 1595, was expressly overruled in Gideon v. Wainwright. Moreover, Betts v. Brady did not hold that out and out denial of counsel in a noncapital case was permissible. Rather, if the trial court had made a bona fide effort to ascertain whether the defendant needed counsel, then the Fourteenth Amendment would not bar conviction.

Gideon’s case was by way of post conviction habeas corpus filed two years after judgment.

We hold Gideon v. Wainwright works retrospectively. See dissent of Harlan, J., in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2, 84 S.Ct. 80, 11 L.Ed.2d 41.

The judgment below is reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI