Smith v. State

79 Ala. 257
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 79 Ala. 257 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 79 Ala. 257 (Ala. 1885).

Opinion

STONE, O. J.

Defendant was prosecuted for carrying a pistol concealed about his person, under section 4109, as amended by act approved February 19, 1881. — Sess. Acts, 38. To carry, in this statute, means “ to convey, bear, or transport, by sustaining the thing carried, or causing it to be sustained.” Worcester’s Dictionary. We think that, ex vi termini, it is [259]*259continuous in its nature, and that the two alleged acts shown in the proof, amount to no more than one continuous act of carrying.—Owens v. The State, 74 Ala. 401. Any other interpretation would furnish no rule for determining into how many indictable offenses one act of continuous carrying could be subdivided.

Bevérsed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowman v. State
127 So. 911 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Jones v. State
99 So. 770 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
State v. McAninch
172 Iowa 96 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
Dean v. State
98 Ala. 71 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Ladd v. State
92 Ala. 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Etress v. State
88 Ala. 191 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 Ala. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-ala-1885.