Smith v. State

79 Ala. 257
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

STONE, O. J.

Defendant was prosecuted for carrying a pistol concealed about his person, under section 4109, as amended by act approved February 19, 1881. — Sess. Acts, 38. To carry, in this statute, means “ to convey, bear, or transport, by sustaining the thing carried, or causing it to be sustained.” Worcester’s Dictionary. We think that, ex vi termini, it is [259] continuous in its nature, and that the two alleged acts shown in the proof, amount to no more than one continuous act of carrying.—Owens v. The State, 74 Ala. 401. Any other interpretation would furnish no rule for determining into how many indictable offenses one act of continuous carrying could be subdivided.

Bevérsed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 79 Ala. 257 (Ala. 1885).

79 Ala. 257 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowman v. State
127 So. 911 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Jones v. State
99 So. 770 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)
State v. McAninch
172 Iowa 96 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
Dean v. State
98 Ala. 71 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Ladd v. State
92 Ala. 58 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Etress v. State
88 Ala. 191 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)