Etress v. State

88 Ala. 191
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

The act of carrying a concealed weapon is, ex vi termini, continuous in its nature. — Smith v. State, 79 Ala. 257. An act of tbis character may be shown by testimony of the fact of possession of the weapon, concealed from ordinary observation, at any time during the continuance of it; and the introduction of evidence of such possession and concealment at different times, covered by tbe one continuous act, does not present a case on which tbe State should be put to an election of the particular moment of the offense for which it will proceed. — Owens v. State, 74 Ala. 401.

The rulings of the County Court were in accordance with these principles, and its judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Etress v. State, 88 Ala. 191 (Ala. 1889).

88 Ala. 191 (Etress v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
75 So. 278 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)
Dean v. State
98 Ala. 71 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)