Smith v. St. Tammany Parish School Board

302 F. Supp. 106, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9830
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana
DecidedJuly 2, 1969
DocketCiv. A. 15463
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 302 F. Supp. 106 (Smith v. St. Tammany Parish School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. St. Tammany Parish School Board, 302 F. Supp. 106, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9830 (E.D. La. 1969).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

RUBIN, District Judge.

Last year 15,938 children, 11,924 white and 4,014 black, attended the 32 schools in the ten wards comprising the St. Tammany Parish School System. Because six schools were all-Negro 1 and five were all-white, this Court on February 6, 1969, ordered the school board to modify its plan for the 1969-70 school year and specifically ordered the elimination of the all-Negro schools for the coming school year. In accordance with the discussion in Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, E.D.La.1969, 304 F.Supp. 244, decided this date, the plan submitted by the school board will be *108 approved to the extent it complies with constitutional requirements.

The plan for the 1969-70 school year has eliminated the all-Negro schools. It provides for no schools that will be “predominantly” Negro, and only two schools are expected to have a majority of Negro students. Although the assignment of students to attend schools in the wards they reside in will result in the continuation of Lee Road Consolidated and Sixth Ward Junior High as all-white schools, this results only from residential patterns — not any racial discrimination — and is therefore acceptable. The school board also proposes to continue Pearl' River Junior High and Pearl River High as all-white schools. However, a few Negro students do reside within the areas served by those schools. It follows under the law that these two schools must be integrated for the 1969-70 school year, and the most appropriate method of assigning Negro students to those schools appears to be by geographic zoning, the method used by the school board for the desegregation of other formerly all-white schools. The faculties of those two schools, presently all-white, must likewise be desegregated. United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 395 U.S. 225, 89 S.Ct. 1670, 23 L.Ed.2d 263 (United States Supreme Court, June 2, 1969). The school board will therefore be required to assign at least two Negro teachers to each of these two schools. In order to facilitate faculty adjustment at these two schools, the Board should select experienced teachers for this assignment.

The schools throughout the parish have been operated on a coeducational basis. This coming school year, however, it is proposed that six schools will be segregated by sex. In Ward III Covington Rosenwald, formerly an all-Negro school, will be attended solely by boys of both races in grades 7-9, and Pine View, also a former all-Negro school, will be attended solely by girls of both races in grades 7-9. A similar situation is proposed in Ward VII where boys of both races in grades 1-9 will attend the formerly all-Negro Chahta-Ima School and girls of both races in grades 1-9 will attend the formerly all-white Bayou Lacombe Junior High School. Likewise, in Ward IX the formerly all-Negro St. Tammany High School will be attended solely by boys of both races in grades 6-8 and girls of both races in grades 6-8 will attend the formerly predominantly white Slidell Junior High. The school board offers this proposal only as a transitory measure designed to ease the conversion to a unitary system. For the reasons set forth in Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, supra, the Court will approve this proposal for the 1969-70 school year.

Both the plaintiff and the plaintiff-intervenor object to the proposed closing of the all-Negro Folsom Rosenwald School in Ward II which is an adequate school facility. Its displaced students would be assigned to Folsom Consolidated, presently a predominantly white school with a capacity of 350 students. The board’s proposal would seriously overtax the facilities of Folsom Consolidated, which has a projected enrollment for the 1969 school year of 523. No valid educational reason exists for abandoning the satisfactory educational facilities of the Folsom Rosenwald School, hitherto identified as black, and requiring its students and faculty to relocate. No such burden is placed upon white students or teachers. Since the proposed closing creates serious problems of overcapacity and cannot be justified on any rational administrative basis, it is inherently discriminatory and therefore invalid. Consequently, the Court will require the school board to keep the Folsom Rosenwald School open and assign students to that school on a non-discriminatory geographic zoning basis.

Desegregation of some of the formerly all-white schools is to be accomplished by the assignment of Negroes to those schools on the basis of geographic proximity. The plaintiff objects to this method of assigning Ne *109 groes to these schools because white students attending those schools do so through the exercise of freedom of choice. This objection is without merit. Negroes had the same freedom of choice as did the white students. They could have chosen to attend those schools. They did not. It was therefore up to the school board to assign Negro students to those schools in order to effectively establish a unitary system. We find nothing discriminatory in the adoption of this method of assignment for the 1969-70 school year.

Last year there was only minimal faculty desegregation; this was due, in large part, to the fact that there were eleven segregated schools. With the desegregation of these schools, there should be maximum faculty integration this coming school year. The school board plans to integrate the faculties so that the ratio of white to Negro teachers in each school approximates the ratio of white to Negro students in that school. There is no objection by the plaintiff or the plaintiff-intervenor to this method of assigning teachers for the 1969-70 school year, and it will therefore be approved for the coming school year. Plaintiff-intervenor urges, however, in reliance upon United States v. Montgomery County Board of Education, 395 U.S. 225, 89 S.Ct. 1670, 23 L. Ed.2d 263 (United States Supreme Court, June 2, 1969), that, in subsequent years, teachers be assigned so that the ratio of white to Negro teachers in each school approximates the ratio of white to Negro teachers in the St. Tammany Parish School System. In accordance with Montgomery, the Court will require that teachers be so assigned beginning with the 1969-70 school year.

ORDER

It is ordered that the St. Tammany Parish School System hereafter be operated as follows:

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

A. All classroom assignments shall be made on a racially non-discriminatory basis and in such a manner that no class is racially identifiable.

B. All educational programs, activities, and services, curricular or extracurricular, sponsored, conducted, operated or supported by the St. Tammany Parish School System shall be run on a racially non-discriminatory basis.

C. All school facilities, recreational areas, and meeting rooms shall be utilized in a non-discriminatory manner.

D. All school-sponsored organizations, shall be run on a racially non-discriminatory basis.

E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milliken v. Bradley
433 U.S. 267 (Supreme Court, 1977)
Stanton v. Sequoia Union High School District
408 F. Supp. 502 (N.D. California, 1976)
School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Education
287 N.E.2d 438 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1972)
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
328 F. Supp. 1346 (W.D. North Carolina, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 F. Supp. 106, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-st-tammany-parish-school-board-laed-1969.