Smith v. Society National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. Society National Bank

238 S.E.2d 739, 143 Ga. App. 370, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2324

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 30, 1977

Docket54286

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 238 S.E.2d 739 (Smith v. Society National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Society National Bank, 238 S.E.2d 739, 143 Ga. App. 370, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2324 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

On a prior appeal we reversed the portion of the trial judge’s order setting out an amount owed under an installment contract as $8,469.72. For the facts herein involved see Smith v. Society Nat. Bank, 141 Ga. App. 19 (232 SE2d 367).

The defendant appeals from the subsequent judgment containing a new finding of fact as to the amount owed. Held:

1. There is no merit to the contention that filing suit for the entire amount of the unpaid balance amounted to an election of remedies.

2. We now consider whether the subsequent order of *371 the trial judge comports with our decision.

Submitted September 14, 1977 Decided September 30, 1977. Edge & Edge, John D. Edge, for appellants. Jefferson L. Davis, Jr., for appellee.

The appellee concedes the present order erroneously computed the amount due and attempts to give what is contended to be the correct formula and resultant amount. As we held in the previous appeal there was a violation of Code Ann. § 96-1008 (Ga. L. 1967, pp. 674, 683) which results in the holder being barred from recovery of any finance charge. Hence, the amount due would be $12,099.60 less the entire finance charge of $5,282.75, leaving a principal balance of $6,816.85. From that sum must be further deducted the amount of payments made ($3,629.88) and the pro rata creditsdue for unearned property insurance and credit life premiums. See Harrison v. Goodyear Service Stores, 137 Ga. App. 223, 225 (223 SE2d 261).

Judgment affirmed on condition that, within 30 days after this court’s remittitur reaches the trial court, the trial judge enter an order in compliance with this opinion; otherwise reversed.

Judgment affirmed on condition.

Shulman and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

On a prior appeal we reversed the portion of the trial judge’s order setting out an amount owed under an installment contract as $8,469.72. For the facts herein involved see Smith v. Society Nat. Bank, 141 Ga. App. 19 (232 SE2d 367).

The defendant appeals from the subsequent judgment containing a new finding of fact as to the amount owed. Held:

1. There is no merit to the contention that filing suit for the entire amount of the unpaid balance amounted to an election of remedies.

2. We now consider whether the subsequent order of *371 the trial judge comports with our decision.

Submitted September 14, 1977 Decided September 30, 1977. Edge & Edge, John D. Edge, for appellants. Jefferson L. Davis, Jr., for appellee.

The appellee concedes the present order erroneously computed the amount due and attempts to give what is contended to be the correct formula and resultant amount. As we held in the previous appeal there was a violation of Code Ann. § 96-1008 (Ga. L. 1967, pp. 674, 683) which results in the holder being barred from recovery of any finance charge. Hence, the amount due would be $12,099.60 less the entire finance charge of $5,282.75, leaving a principal balance of $6,816.85. From that sum must be further deducted the amount of payments made ($3,629.88) and the pro rata creditsdue for unearned property insurance and credit life premiums. See Harrison v. Goodyear Service Stores, 137 Ga. App. 223, 225 (223 SE2d 261).

Judgment affirmed on condition that, within 30 days after this court’s remittitur reaches the trial court, the trial judge enter an order in compliance with this opinion; otherwise reversed.

Judgment affirmed on condition.

Shulman and Banke, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 S.E.2d 739, 143 Ga. App. 370, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-society-national-bank-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack