Smith v. Smith

125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1923
StatusPublished

This text of 125 A. 927 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Smith, 125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712 (N.J. 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-nj-1923.