Smith v. Smith
125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 N.J. Eq. 657 →
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Smith, 125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712 (N.J. 1923).
125 A. 927 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.