Smith v. Smith

125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 N.J. Eq. 657
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1923·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 125 A. 927, 94 N.J. Eq. 570, 9 Stock. 570, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 712 (N.J. 1923).

125 A. 927 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.