Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Smith v. Smith

123 A. 926, 95 N.J. Eq. 714, 10 Stock. 714, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 900

DecidedJanuary 25, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A. 926 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith, 123 A. 926, 95 N.J. Eq. 714, 10 Stock. 714, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 900 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that the decree of the court of chancery should be affirmed. We are not satisfied, however, with the result reached by the learned vice-chancellor, who heard the case on the first charge made in the petition against the defendant, viz., August 27th and 29th, 1918. We 'think the evidence is not sufficient to base a decree upon this charge. Otherwise the decree is affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Acicerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Parker, Katzenbach, Gardner, Clark —4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Our examination of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that the decree of the court of chancery should be affirmed. We are not satisfied, however, with the result reached by the learned vice-chancellor, who heard the case on the first charge made in the petition against the defendant, viz., August 27th and 29th, 1918. We 'think the evidence is not sufficient to base a decree upon this charge. Otherwise the decree is affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Acicerson, Van Buskirk—9. For reversal—Parker, Katzenbach, Gardner, Clark —4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A. 926, 95 N.J. Eq. 714, 10 Stock. 714, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-nj-1924.