Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith

158 So. 3d 622, 2013 WL 6816690, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10193 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2013·No. No. 5D13-26·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of the lack of a transcript, we are compelled to affirm. See Arnold v. Whitley, 97 So.3d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (judgment of trial court comes to appellate court clothed with presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in absence of record demonstrating error).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 158 So. 3d 622, 2013 WL 6816690, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20382 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

158 So. 3d 622 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. Whitley
97 So. 3d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)