Arnold v. Whitley

97 So. 3d 339, 2012 WL 4208563, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15885
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 2012·No. No. 5D12-1019·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tamalari Arnold appeals pro se from a final judgment on petition for determination of paternity, time sharing, and related relief. Our review of this case is limited because the record contains no transcript of the final hearing. Consequently, we can only address errors that appear on the face of the final judgment. See Engesser v. Engesser, 42 So.3d 249, 250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). On appeal, the trial court’s ruling is presumed correct, and when no transcript is provided, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous will be affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Having reviewed the final judgment entered, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. Whitley, 97 So. 3d 339, 2012 WL 4208563, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15885 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

97 So. 3d 339 (Arnold v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Echcho Maria Hart v. Dade County Federal Credit Union
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Williams v. Jessica L. Kerr, P.A.
271 So. 3d 82 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Smith v. Smith
158 So. 3d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
O'Shea v. O'Shea
124 So. 3d 412 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Southern Fields Homeowners v. Rodriguez
119 So. 3d 543 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)