O'Shea v. O'Shea

124 So. 3d 412, 2013 WL 5761972, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17031, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2240
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 2013·No. No. 5D13-2159·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of the lack of a transcript, we are compelled to affirm. See Arnold v. Whitley, 97 So.3d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (judgment of trial court comes to appellate court clothed with presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in absence of record demonstrating error).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Shea v. O'Shea, 124 So. 3d 412, 2013 WL 5761972, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17031, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2240 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

124 So. 3d 412 (O'Shea v. O'Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. Whitley
97 So. 3d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)