O'Shea v. O'Shea

124 So. 3d 412, 2013 WL 5761972, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17031, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2240
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 2013
DocketNo. 5D13-2159
StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 3d 412 (O'Shea v. O'Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Shea v. O'Shea, 124 So. 3d 412, 2013 WL 5761972, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17031, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2240 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because of the lack of a transcript, we are compelled to affirm. See Arnold v. Whitley, 97 So.3d 339 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (judgment of trial court comes to appellate court clothed with presumption of correctness and may not be disturbed in absence of record demonstrating error).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. Whitley
97 So. 3d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 3d 412, 2013 WL 5761972, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17031, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshea-v-oshea-fladistctapp-2013.