Smith v. Smith

374 So. 2d 18, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1979·No. No. 78-592·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the appellant’s four points on appeal challenging the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered below and conclude that no abuse of discretion has occurred. While we may have awarded the appellant/wife a greater amount of alimony and child support had we been the trial judge, was are not at liberty to substitute our judgment for that of the court below. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Smith, 374 So. 2d 18, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

374 So. 2d 18 (Smith v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fagan v. Lewis
374 So. 2d 18 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)