Smith v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smith v. Smith

374 So. 2d 18, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1979

DocketNo. 78-592

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 So. 2d 18 (Smith v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Smith, 374 So. 2d 18, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the appellant’s four points on appeal challenging the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered below and conclude that no abuse of discretion has occurred. While we may have awarded the appellant/wife a greater amount of alimony and child support had we been the trial judge, was are not at liberty to substitute our judgment for that of the court below. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the appellant’s four points on appeal challenging the final judgment of dissolution of marriage entered below and conclude that no abuse of discretion has occurred. While we may have awarded the appellant/wife a greater amount of alimony and child support had we been the trial judge, was are not at liberty to substitute our judgment for that of the court below. See Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 So. 2d 18, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-smith-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack