Smith v. Short

11 Iowa 523
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 15, 1861·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Wright, J.

The injunction in this case was improperly .granted, and the demurrer to the bill should have been sustained.

Complainant seeks to enjoin an action at law, which Tay[524] lor, as the assignee of Short, was prosecuting to collect a part of the purchase money of certain real estate. He avers that Short had no title to the property; that he induced bim to enter into said contract by the use of fraudulent means; that the consideration has failed, and that Taylor when he took the assignment had full notice of all these, matters. It is not intimated that either Taylor or Short are insolvent, nor that any necessity exists for appealing to the conscience of the respondents for a discovery. For aught that is shown, every matter stated in the- bill, can be made as fully available in answer and defense, to the action at law, as by an appeal to equity. Under such circumstances, the parties should be left to their legal remedies and defenses.

The order granting the injunction is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Short, 11 Iowa 523 (iowa 1861).

11 Iowa 523 (Smith v. Short) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bankers Life Co. v. Bennett
263 N.W. 44 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1935)
Beeman v. Bankers Life Co.
247 N.W. 673 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Lynch v. Schemmel
176 Iowa 499 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)
McIntosh v. Brown
139 N.W. 926 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1913)
Biermann v. Guaranty Mutual Life Insurance
120 N.W. 963 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1909)
Security Savings Bank v. Carroll
103 N.W. 379 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1905)
Home Savings & Trust Co. v. Hicks
89 N.W. 103 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Anderson v. Orient Fire Insurance
55 N.W. 348 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)