Smith v. Pink
Opinion
1, mix ei,:zizsARY
NO. 2869O
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(... :;1“*’4 "‘§
0F THE sTATE 0F HAwAfI
JEFFREY sMITH AND LAUREL sMITH, plaintiffs-Appe1f§§ v, HEINz-GUENTHER PINK, Defendant-Appe11ant #"
ne ;3 w Lz nev am
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
HONOLULU DIVISION
(CIVIL NO. lRCO7-7ll)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Foley, Presiding Judge,
Fujise and Leonard, JJ.) Upon consideration of Defendant#Appellant Heinz~
Guenther Pink's letter dated April 20,
2010, which this Court will construe as a motion to reconsider the April l5,
summary disposition order, the papers in support, and the records and files herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.
DATED:
Honolulu, Hawafi, April 27, 20lO.
¢£.~//2 /»’»Q
Presiding Judge 7
On the motion:
Heinz-Guenther Pink Pro Se Defendant-Appellant
g§‘\\.£
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Pink (Smith v. Pink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.