Smith v. Ogle

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 10, 2023
Docket3:21-cv-01129
StatusUnknown

This text of Smith v. Ogle (Smith v. Ogle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Ogle, (M.D. Pa. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN SMITH, : Civil No. 3:21-cv-1129 : Petitioner : : (Judge Sylvia H. Rambo) v. : : ADAM OGLE, Warden of York : County Prison, et al., : : Respondents :

ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2023, upon consideration of Petitioner John Smith’s petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus, the report (Doc. 8) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, and Respondent Ogle’s objections (Docs. 9-10) thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The report (Doc. 8) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.

2. Smith’s petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge.

3. An immigration judge shall conduct an individualized bond hearing within 30 days of the date of this order.

4. At the hearing, the immigration judge shall make an individualized inquiry as to whether Smith is a flight risk or a danger to the community in accordance with Santos v. Warden Pike County Correctional Facility, 965 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2020). 5. At the hearing, the government shall bear the burden of putting forth clear and convincing evidence that continued detention is necessary “to prevent [Smith] from fleeing or harming the community.” Id. at 214 (citing Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden York County Prison, 783 F.3d 469, 477-78 (3d Cir. 2015)).

6. The parties shall report to the court the outcome of the individualized bond hearing within seven days of the date of the immigration judge’s hearing.

7. If the immigration judge fails to convene an individualized bond hearing within 30 days of the date of this order, the court will reopen this case and conduct its own individualized bond hearing under the standards governing bail in habeas corpus proceedings.

8. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo Sylvia H. Rambo United States District Judge Middle District of Pennsylvania

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jose Chavez-Alvarez v. Warden York County Prison
783 F.3d 469 (Third Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Smith v. Ogle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-ogle-pamd-2023.