Smith v. McWhirter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. McWhirter. Read the opinion of the Court — 415 F. App'x 510
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2011·No. 10-6902·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6902

FRANKLIN C. SMITH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BRADY W. MCWHIRTER, Officer for the Richmond Police Department; SECOND OFFICER UNKNOWN, Officer for the Richmond Police Department,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. M. Janet Palmer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Smith v. McWhirter, No. 2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va.

June 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. McWhirter, (4th Cir. 2011).

Smith v. McWhirter (Smith v. McWhirter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related