Smith v. McWhirter
This text of Smith v. McWhirter (Smith v. McWhirter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6902
FRANKLIN C. SMITH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BRADY W. MCWHIRTER, Officer for the Richmond Police Department; SECOND OFFICER UNKNOWN, Officer for the Richmond Police Department,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. M. Janet Palmer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Smith v. McWhirter, No. 2:09-cv-00425-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va.
June 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. McWhirter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mcwhirter-ca4-2011.