Smith v. McClure

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. McClure. Read the opinion of the Court — 396 F. App'x 961
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2010·No. 10-1752·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1752

ANTHONY ANTHA SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLES A. MCCLURE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:10-cv-00022-nkm)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Antha Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Antha Smith appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his patent infringement action for failure to state a

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Smith v. McClure, No. 6:10-cv-00022-nkm (W.D.

Va. June 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. McClure, (4th Cir. 2010).

Smith v. McClure (Smith v. McClure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.