Smith v. McClure

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. McClure

396 F. App'x 961

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2010·No. No. 10-1752·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Antha Smith appeals the dis-trict court’s order dismissing his patent infringement action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis-trict court. Smith v. McClure, No. 6:10-cv-00022-nkm, 2010 WL 2326536 (W.D.Va. June 8, 2010). We dispense with oral ar-gument because the facts and legal conten-tions are adequately presented in the ma-terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Antha Smith appeals the dis-trict court’s order dismissing his patent infringement action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis-trict court. Smith v. McClure, No. 6:10-cv-00022-nkm, 2010 WL 2326536 (W.D.Va. June 8, 2010). We dispense with oral ar-gument because the facts and legal conten-tions are adequately presented in the ma-terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Smith v. McClure, 396 F. App'x 961 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

396 F. App'x 961 (Smith v. McClure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related