Smith v. McClure
This text of Smith v. McClure (Smith v. McClure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1752
ANTHONY ANTHA SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES A. MCCLURE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:10-cv-00022-nkm)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Antha Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Antha Smith appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his patent infringement action for failure to state a
claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Smith v. McClure, No. 6:10-cv-00022-nkm (W.D.
Va. June 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. McClure, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-mcclure-ca4-2010.