Smith v. Martin
1 Trans. App. 25
Opinion
The Appellants in this case, when it was reached in its order on the- calendar, failed to appear and furnish papers on which it could be heard. The Respondent appeared and submitted the case on her part, upon her printed brief, in accordance with the 25th rule of the Court. The Appellants have, also, failed since to submit points pursuant to the said rule.
The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed of course (Kelly v. McCormick, 28 N. Y. R. 323).
All concur except Grover, Justice, who is absent.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Martin, 1 Trans. App. 25 (N.Y. 1867).
1 Trans. App. 25 (Smith v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.