Smith v. Martin

New York Court of Appeals

Smith v. Martin

1 Trans. App. 25

DecidedJanuary 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Trans. App. 25 (Smith v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Martin, 1 Trans. App. 25 (N.Y. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Parker, J.

The Appellants in this case, when it was reached in its order on the- calendar, failed to appear and furnish papers on which it could be heard. The Respondent appeared and submitted the case on her part, upon her printed brief, in accordance with the 25th rule of the Court. The Appellants have, also, failed since to submit points pursuant to the said rule.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed of course (Kelly v. McCormick, 28 N. Y. R. 323).

All concur except Grover, Justice, who is absent.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker, J.

The Appellants in this case, when it was reached in its order on the- calendar, failed to appear and furnish papers on which it could be heard. The Respondent appeared and submitted the case on her part, upon her printed brief, in accordance with the 25th rule of the Court. The Appellants have, also, failed since to submit points pursuant to the said rule.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed of course (Kelly v. McCormick, 28 N. Y. R. 323).

All concur except Grover, Justice, who is absent.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Trans. App. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-martin-ny-1867.