Smith v. Martin
3 Keyes 373
Opinion
The appellants in this case, when it was reached in its order on the calendar, failed to appear and furnish papers on which it could be heard. The respondent appeared and submitted the case on her part, upon her printed brief, in accordance with the twenty-fifth rule of the court. The appellants have also failed since to submit points pursuant to the said rule.
The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, of course. (Kelly v. McCormick, 28 N. Y. 323.)
All the judges concurring,
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Martin, 3 Keyes 373 (N.Y. 1867).
3 Keyes 373 (Smith v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. . McCormick
28 N.Y. 318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1863)