Smith v. Luna
134 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2005·No. No. 04-35549; D.C. No. CV-04-00084-JWS·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Alaska state prisoner Ruple Marx Smith appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.
Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Luna, 134 F. App'x 209 (9th Cir. 2005).
134 F. App'x 209 (Smith v. Luna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willie Lee Miles v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
187 F.3d 1104 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)