Smith v. Lloyd

224 N.W.2d 670, 56 Mich. App. 576, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 758
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided November 25, 1974·No. Docket 16873·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Van Valkenburg, J.

Plaintiffs’ motion to compel payment from the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund was denied. The amount of the settlement reached in the present action was set off against the amount owing from plaintiff Hugh Smith to the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund pursuant to a stipulated judgment in another case. Plaintiffs appeal.

The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund Act does not grant the power of setoff to the Secretary of State nor can the Secretary compel judicial setoff of competing claims. Castro v Goemaere, 53 Mich App 78; 218 NW2d 395 (1974).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment without the setoff. Costs to the plaintiffs.

Bronson, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Lloyd, 224 N.W.2d 670, 56 Mich. App. 576, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 758 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).

224 N.W.2d 670 (Smith v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wayne County v. State Treasurer
306 N.W.2d 468 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1981)
Secretary of State v. Greco
271 N.W.2d 291 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1978)
Smith v. Lloyd
224 N.W.2d 670 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1974)