Smith v. Lloyd
This text of 224 N.W.2d 670 (Smith v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Plaintiffs’ motion to compel payment from the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund was denied. The amount of the settlement reached in the present action was set off against the amount owing from plaintiff Hugh Smith to the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund pursuant to a stipulated judgment in another case. Plaintiffs appeal.
The Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund Act does not grant the power of setoff to the Secretary of State nor can the Secretary compel judicial setoff of competing claims. Castro v Goemaere, 53 Mich App 78; 218 NW2d 395 (1974).
Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment without the setoff. Costs to the plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 N.W.2d 670, 56 Mich. App. 576, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lloyd-michctapp-1974.