Smith v. Linn
587 A.2d 309, 526 Pa. 447
This text of 587 A.2d 309 (Smith v. Linn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Linn, 587 A.2d 309, 526 Pa. 447 (Pa. 1991).
Opinion
David H. SMITH, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Patricia Smith, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Robert LINN, D.O., Lyle Stuart, Inc., Dixon-Shane, Inc., Howard Rosenfeld, M.D., Robard Corporation of Cherry Hill, N.J.
v.
HANCE BROTHERS and White Company, Wilson Foods Corporation, Delare Associates, Inc., General Foods Corporation, U.S. Gelatin, Division of Peter Cooper Corporation.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Thomas B. Rutter, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Albert B. Gerber, Philadelphia, for Lyle Stuart, Inc.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.
McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. Linn
587 A.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
587 A.2d 309, 526 Pa. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-linn-pa-1991.