Smith v. Lindemulder
This text of Smith v. Lindemulder (Smith v. Lindemulder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
02/09/2022
Case Number: DA 21-0491
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA CASE NO. DA 21-0491 __________________________________________________________________
LILY M. SMITH and VERNON T. LINDEMULDER,
Petitioners and Appellees,
v.
SAMUEL B. LINDEMULDER, individually and as Trustee of the Alice M. Lindemulder Trust,
Respondent and Appellant and
DANIEL G. LINDEMULDER, individually and as Trustee of the Alice M. Lindemulder Trust,
Respondent and Appellee.
__________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE BRIEF __________________________________________________________________
Upon motion of the Petitioners/Appellees through counsel,
Respondent/Appellant having no objection thereto, and pursuant to Rule 26(1), Mont.
R. App. P.:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners/Appellees are granted an additional 30-day extension until March 14, 2022, in which to file their response to
Appellant’s Opening Brief dated January 12, 2022.
Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court February 9 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Lindemulder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lindemulder-mont-2022.