Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Smith v. Lift-A-Loft Equipment, Inc.

Smith v. Lift-A-Loft Equipment, Inc.

210 A.D.2d 989, 621 N.Y.S.2d 964
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 A.D.2d 989 (Smith v. Lift-A-Loft Equipment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Lift-A-Loft Equipment, Inc., 210 A.D.2d 989, 621 N.Y.S.2d 964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs’ motion to increase the amount of damages sought in the ad damnum clause of the complaint. No prejudice to defendants was shown (see, Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, rearg denied 55 NY2d 801; Luchsinger v County of Onondaga, 63 AD2d 819, 819-820). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Genesee County, Morton, J.—Increase Ad Damnum Clause.) Present—Denman, P. J., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ. (Filed Nov. 29, 1994,)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.
245 A.D.2d 1112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 A.D.2d 989, 621 N.Y.S.2d 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lift-a-loft-equipment-inc-nyappdiv-1994.